The noisy controversy over Rachel
Dolezal’s self-defining ethnicity in the last few days reminded me of the furore about black
sections in the Labour Party in the mid-1980s. This is an extract from my book Rejoice! Rejoice!:
The
conflict between the new identity politics and the Labour leadership was
evident in the issue of black sections that arose in the middle of the decade.
Black activists, particularly in London, began to call in 1983 for separate
sections to be organized within constituency Labour parties, based on the model
of the existing women’s sections.
They met with immediate opposition, both from
the left – Eric Heffer and Militant
were opposed in their own ways – and from above: ‘It would create significant
problems of racial definition which could lead only too easily to endless
unproductive acrimony,’ pronounced Neil Kinnock in 1984.
The
following year, two of the leading campaigners, Sharon Atkin and Diane
Abbott, met Kinnock to press their case, but again found themselves rebuffed.
He asked who would be eligible to join, and was told that the sections would be
open to anyone who considered themselves black. ‘Can I consider myself black?’
he asked, and they replied: ‘Patently not, because you’re so obviously white.’
He later told the press: ‘I consider, and so do most other people, the idea of
a segregated section on the basis of colour or racial origin to be repellent.’
Despite
the opposition, several local parties did set up unofficial black sections,
starting with Vauxhall and Lewisham East in London, though their contribution
didn’t always seem to be characterized by compromise and comradeship.
‘The
Labour Party itself perpetuates racism,’ claimed a booklet produced by the
Vauxhall branch for the 1984 conference. ‘It is an institution rooted in a
racist society and its own routine practices, customs and forms of organization
exclude black people from the structures of power as effectively as if they
were barred from membership.’ A conference resolution that year to set up
official black sections was rejected by the union block votes.
It was
a contentious issue and one that produced a series of anomalies. The Enfield
and Barnet branch of the far-right National Front passed a resolution welcoming
the idea ‘as the first stage in the realignment of British politics on racial
lines,’ adding that: ‘These sections clearly indicate both the inability and
unwillingness of blacks to integrate into British society.’
Meanwhile
a selection meeting in the Brent South constituency chose Paul Boateng as its
parliamentary candidate, but was faced by a demonstration led by Sharon Atkin
because the local party didn’t have a black section, even though all those on
the shortlist were themselves black.
The
controversy died down almost as swiftly as it had arisen. The gradual adoption
of leading black figures as parliamentary candidates – Diane Abbott, Bernie
Grant, Keith Vaz, Russell Profitt (who had been the party’s only black
candidate in 1979) – took much of the steam out of the campaign, leading some
to conclude that all along it had been, in Roy Hattersley’s words, ‘really a
vehicle for promoting the parliamentary ambitions of metropolitan, middle-class
professionals’.
Interesting, I think there was a clip of Michael/Russell Profitt debating Joe Ashton on Dominic Sandbrook’s BBC TV series on the 80s a couple of years ago. Profitt stood for Lewisham West in 1987 and lost. The seat turned Labour in 1992.
ReplyDelete